kronin323
Font of Useless Knowledge
But here's one that seriously needed some testing - Violet, donated by @Rusty M. We've already shown with the Ruby test the the base tint color can be significantly altered by the iridium. But can it be altered so much that a neutral base becomes contrast? That's been the argument around Violet...
Now that tint is indisputably contrast...
On to the test...
With a little bit of the iridium removed...
And by the time I got this far...
It was looking like this...
And here's the final result...
And there you go. Violet actually has a neutral grey base tint, and it appears contrast because of the iridium.
Frankly, I did not expect this. I thought the base tint would be contrast. I'm shocked. Flabbergasted. Gobstoppered. I'm very glad I performed this test; the truth is revealed.
But it does beg the question - should Violet be considered neutral or contrast? Despite the base tint being neutral, with the iridium it still looks and functions as a contrast lens. Does the base tint have to be contrast to be considered a contrast lens, or is the end result what's important, regardless of which component provides the contrast effect?
Personally I believe it should still be classified as a contrast tint. But now we know with certainty that the base tint is actually neutral, and the contrast is an effect of the iridium...
Now that tint is indisputably contrast...
On to the test...
With a little bit of the iridium removed...
And by the time I got this far...
It was looking like this...
And here's the final result...
And there you go. Violet actually has a neutral grey base tint, and it appears contrast because of the iridium.
Frankly, I did not expect this. I thought the base tint would be contrast. I'm shocked. Flabbergasted. Gobstoppered. I'm very glad I performed this test; the truth is revealed.
But it does beg the question - should Violet be considered neutral or contrast? Despite the base tint being neutral, with the iridium it still looks and functions as a contrast lens. Does the base tint have to be contrast to be considered a contrast lens, or is the end result what's important, regardless of which component provides the contrast effect?
Personally I believe it should still be classified as a contrast tint. But now we know with certainty that the base tint is actually neutral, and the contrast is an effect of the iridium...
Last edited: