Chris H is the man

[OakleyFrankFMJ]

Go into your profile.

"Personal details"

The option should be there. If not then you don't have enough posts yet

 

[TK7]

Hey @OakleyFrankFMJ how do I make that change? Lol. Btw. My head is getting to big for my fitted caps. Jk. U guys are good to me, just returning the favor.

Those jade and ice PB1 lenses you just did are awesome as well!! Thank you much!!

 

[Chris A Hardaway]

Good looking out @Ingrassiajr7 and @OakleyFrankFMJ

 

[TK7]

Good looking out @Ingrassiajr7 and @OakleyFrankFMJ

I like the new call tag brother!! It fits! (No pun intended)

 

[thisguy]

That Ruby looks very nice against the polished black frame.

 

[PostmanRP]

I'd like to see more of the Dillon lenses on Oakley frames. I was thinking about buying a pair of Dillon's but don't care for there limited frame styles

 

[flyer]

I believe Ruby is highly variable in hue(s), but that one is particularly fine.
In my limited experience, @Chris A Hardaway always seems to go from one great result to the next.
May his shop floor be fathoms deep in shaved Plutonite.

 

[Chris A Hardaway]

By the way. Anyone see the new prop 65 in California? All of Oakleys polycarbonate /plutonite lenses now has been proven to have cancer-causing chemicals in it.
Ugghhhh, at least in the state of California.
So @flyer I might start wearing a mask to wade through my shop lol.

 

[Ventruck]

By the way. Anyone see the new prop 65 in California? All of Oakleys polycarbonate /plutonite lenses now has been proven to have cancer-causing chemicals in it.
Ugghhhh, at least in the state of California.
So @flyer I might start wearing a mask to wade through my shop lol.

Didn't look at it entirely but the few bits I read didn't seem to differentiate between pre-and post-production risk of BpA.

Can easily assume excessive heat or chemical breakdown would actually pose risk for a wearer, and maybe cutting if there's uncleaned residue. Obviously shouldn't eat it in the first place. Otherwise it kinda goes back to "well everything can cause cancer" imo. It'd be pretty crazy if it posed a threat in the sense it's radiating/decaying continuously at a significant rate — and this is assuming there's significant composition in the polycarbonate end product in the first place.

 

[Chris A Hardaway]

@Ventruck I think you nailed it. The state of California just hasn't set a safe level standard yet. Like you said would depend on consumption, or contamination in water, etc. As a consumer I'm not concerned.