U
Username Hidden
Guest
Username Hidden said:I found a couple of pairs that aren't perfect to do some comparisons. SW 2.0 SH Frame with Non SH lenses.
The first picture is BIP, lenses are a bit thicker, or maybe just the bevel is different, idk but they look different around the edges. The second picture is Ice, non polar. The third picture is SH on bottom and Non SH on top. The outside edge matches up perfectly. You can see the inside edge is tapered differently. It's still a very minor gap but it's there. Cannot be seen form the front, only the inside and once on, you can't see it.
View attachment 247773
View attachment 247774
View attachment 247775
Thanks for doing all that! I really appreciate it.
So the SH you have in the bottom pic are presumably just another set of your own or something? Just checking as I don't think you had any SH lenses to sell, did you?
So just to confirm:
- The lenses are perfectly held in, and aren't in any danger of falling out?
- There is no gap from the outside (i.e. other people wouldn't see a gap when looking at you)? Do you have a pic for this btw? No worries if you've already put them back
- Can you see through the gap from the inside to the outside (while holding them, not while on)? Or is it just that it doesn't line up perfectly with the frame? Hard to tell for sure in the pics
- You can't see the gap while wearing them?
Did you say you have BIP for sale? What price would you sell them for shipped to Canada (Toronto area)? And out of interest, what about to Syracuse, NY area if I had them shipped to my colleague instead?
Will definitely consider them, depending on the answers to the above. I see they are definitely different, but depends on some of the above whether I'd be willing to give them a shot.
Thanks,
Graham.