The Extremely Rare Juliet CO2

[The Saint]

I've been thinking about the sub zero that he's selling. I noticed that his have an "O" on the sides while another pair on eBay have "Oakley". Did Oakley make both?

 

[qtrain23]

The o is second generation
That's also a 0.6

 

[The Saint]

The o is second generation
That's also a 0.6

Thanks. I'm learning a little more every day.

RARE Oakley Sub Zero not metal display vintage medusa over juliet romeo elite | eBay

 

[BriP]

thats actually a subzero lens with 0.6 arms. notice the straight outside edges.. and a decent price if its completely minty..

 

[qtrain23]

thats actually a subzero lens with 0.6 arms. notice the straight outside edges.. and a decent price if its completely minty..

why are there so many of those? surplus parts?

 

[dr.chop]

well said. now hurry up with those jade MD's... go over the top and make a green chrome MD with Jade lenses. woohoo!

you mean this Jade Monster Dog?

 

[BriP]

you mean this Jade Monster Dog?

nice is that a chrome frame? are u gonna do a green chrome one?

 

[dr.chop]

nice is that a chrome frame? are u gonna do a green chrome one?

That's metallic black...yeah, I have many more in the works...

 

[The Saint]

I ended up buying a pair of Oakleys from Anton, and I think he's a good guy. His communication before and after the sale was good.

I also read the ad in question on ebay before I saw it linked in this thread. I didn't find anything wrong or misleading about it then, and I don't now. And I'm pretty much a n00b when it comes to Oakleys.

 

[spin_nin]

how in the world is this not clear?

"Two pairs of Juliets were used to achieve this frame combo (Carbon and X-metal frames). The Carbon came from a brand new frame while the X-metal is a mint pre-owned frame. Please expect little wear on the X-metal parts."

Why would there be any wear on a mint item?!? Pre-owned is pre-owned, mint is mint, i.e. mint = closest thing to new besides new. Mint shouldn't have ANY wear / tear whatsoever. That's my $.02. YMMV.