freakface
Oakley Expert
i want the opinion of the forum in a case my friend has.....
he bought an expensive juliet grail from a seller on ebay wherein the item was described as totally mint (tight frame, clean rubbers, scratch-free lenses, complete package with box). item cost a little less than $1,000. after one month, nothing came so he filed a case with paypal. after winning the case and refunded by paypal (yes, that long...), he got a notice from the post office and got his item. upon checking the item, one lens had at least three deep scratches. of course he was not please....
now he is asking my opinion on what he should do. i personally hate sellers that do not describe properly, most likely with intent to fool buyers, but he did get his item.
what do you think he should do? i told him to pay back the seller since he did get his item, but he is pointing out that they were not as described (since this friend only purchases mint vintage items complete with box, sorta like RVF).
your opinions on doing the right thing please....
he bought an expensive juliet grail from a seller on ebay wherein the item was described as totally mint (tight frame, clean rubbers, scratch-free lenses, complete package with box). item cost a little less than $1,000. after one month, nothing came so he filed a case with paypal. after winning the case and refunded by paypal (yes, that long...), he got a notice from the post office and got his item. upon checking the item, one lens had at least three deep scratches. of course he was not please....
now he is asking my opinion on what he should do. i personally hate sellers that do not describe properly, most likely with intent to fool buyers, but he did get his item.
what do you think he should do? i told him to pay back the seller since he did get his item, but he is pointing out that they were not as described (since this friend only purchases mint vintage items complete with box, sorta like RVF).
your opinions on doing the right thing please....