Have used ruby polar alot and never had any problems
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
US people are all fat loudmouths that seem to have forgotten where their ancestors all come from, or are they all indians?In Europe:
Men wear purses and
Women don't shave
I think they got sh!t backwards! But all jokes aside...
I live in FL(similar UV rays to you in Mexico, @Fresh ) and PREFER amber black iridium/ruby/fire, and BIP of course.
Some colored lenses can negatively impact how well a driver can see road signs and traffic lights, and spot potential hazards.
Pink, blue and green lenses should can make red lights indistinguishable. But I think it has to do with older traffic lights. I'd been driving with fire and ruby polars for at least 10 years and never had any issues.
That's why their "beeeahh" tastes like fizzy pond-water.Australia has developed a reputation for being the ultimate "nanny state".
Yes in haze or low light conditions Fire is not suitable at all... G30 works just fine in that type of conditions.That's why their "beeeahh" tastes like fizzy pond-water.
The "colour challenged" among us see a range of different hues, but none are prohibited from driving for colour perception alone.
There are other, redundant clues ( three, vertically stacked lights, the sequence of change in light position, indicating stoplights at an intersection).
I wonder if the recommendation not to use Ruby or Fire while driving is related to a propensity to reflect light flares in traffic...
In haze or low light conditions, I find Fire a particular problem.