You didn’t mention the battery until after I’d paid.The seller of the watch is me and the watch was bought as i told the buyer new at end of 2015. Worn couple of times and remained in its case . the battery died after almost 4 years and i sold it stating that the battery is dead
Noone has touched the back case .
So where is the whole shady of the discussion?
You tell me that a jeweler of yours found the back case very tight. So what the point in that?
I wasn’t familiar with Oakley case backs being tight or hard to open.
The jeweler I usually use has worked on multiple other watches, including rebuilding a Seiko dive watch I’ve had since 1997. That watch is now in perfect running order.
I had no reason to doubt the jeweler’s abilities, so I mentioned that he stated the back was extremely tight, thinking that as an Oakley watch owner you might be familiar with that characteristic.
You were not, so I asked the Forum.
Forum members have stated that case back tightness is a known characteristic, so I’ve taken it to a different place.
With regards to another member bringing up potential shadiness, I agree that not mentioning the need for a new battery until after money has changed hands is at least not preferred.
I’d be interested to know if that’s considered to be a standard occurrence.