I wear contacts 90% of the time so I can wear my non-Rx Oakleys as well. But I'm also considering getting a pair of Rx Sunglasses for days when I don't want to put my contacts on. Like when I go on runs in the early morning, I don't put my contacts on yet since I'm gonna have to remove them again when I shower. Or for weekends when I'm just chilling at home but have to run to the grocery or something.
I had a chat with my insurance agent (UHC Vision) to find out what they cover. I'm eligible for coverage every 12 months, so my next schedule is on November. For Oakleys, they would cover $130 worth for the frames, but they would only be able to cover about $30 for Oakley lenses since they are considered out-of-network. Just looking at estimates from framesdirect.com, looks like these would go around $370ish just for the lens (Black Iridium Polarized).
My other option, if I go with non-Oakley (ie. in house Lens Crafters), my insurance would be able to cover a good chunk of it. I haven't ordered Rx sunglasses before, but my daily non-tinted glasses the last time I ordered was less than $100 if I remember correctly.
My question then is, what are your opinions on non-Oakley Rx tinted lenses? Also, any good stores that can closely match the looks/performance of actual Oakley lenses?
So the difference between the two options would be at least $270 for just the lens. If I go Oakley, I will probably not buy the frame and just reuse my existing frame (since insurance doesn't cover the lenses, I'll use insurance to buy contacts). If I go non-Oakley, I'd get a new frame since insurance is going to cover them anyways. Also If I go the non-Oakley route, I'll have to wait until November to order them. If I decide to get Oakley's, I would order them now so I can use them this summer.
If it helps, I'm interested in Flak Jackets with Black Iridium Polarized lenses. But I'm still reading into whether I'd like Prizm Dailies better, they seem to get good reviews as an every day lens.
Thanks
tl;dr - want Rx sunglasses, Flak Jackets, need opinions whether to get Oakley or non-Oakley lenses
I had a chat with my insurance agent (UHC Vision) to find out what they cover. I'm eligible for coverage every 12 months, so my next schedule is on November. For Oakleys, they would cover $130 worth for the frames, but they would only be able to cover about $30 for Oakley lenses since they are considered out-of-network. Just looking at estimates from framesdirect.com, looks like these would go around $370ish just for the lens (Black Iridium Polarized).
My other option, if I go with non-Oakley (ie. in house Lens Crafters), my insurance would be able to cover a good chunk of it. I haven't ordered Rx sunglasses before, but my daily non-tinted glasses the last time I ordered was less than $100 if I remember correctly.
My question then is, what are your opinions on non-Oakley Rx tinted lenses? Also, any good stores that can closely match the looks/performance of actual Oakley lenses?
So the difference between the two options would be at least $270 for just the lens. If I go Oakley, I will probably not buy the frame and just reuse my existing frame (since insurance doesn't cover the lenses, I'll use insurance to buy contacts). If I go non-Oakley, I'd get a new frame since insurance is going to cover them anyways. Also If I go the non-Oakley route, I'll have to wait until November to order them. If I decide to get Oakley's, I would order them now so I can use them this summer.
If it helps, I'm interested in Flak Jackets with Black Iridium Polarized lenses. But I'm still reading into whether I'd like Prizm Dailies better, they seem to get good reviews as an every day lens.
Thanks
tl;dr - want Rx sunglasses, Flak Jackets, need opinions whether to get Oakley or non-Oakley lenses