I wan to contribute my observations of fake Romeo 1.0. they have become better, but is still recognizable. The devil is in the details. These are screenshots, I have taken from a portuguese Youtuber, who I think, is being duped.
Here you can see, the typical pointers to a fake R1. The "O" inside is flat instead of following the form. The orbital screws holes doesn't drop down to the "X" nose bridge, it's straight, the screws are, as known, hex screws on the top. The temple shox are protruding at the hinges.
The lower oribtal/"X" nosebridge has philips screws inside, instead of the locking pins. The hammerstem is thicker at the hinges and squared, instead of bevel sanded, probably due to structural reasons, since it's a simple white metal, it probably would bend. And the known nosebombs of the Juliet. Removing it, reveals that there are no hooks for the original bombs.
Here, a much clearer view of the side of the "O".
The end tips at the ears doc are thicker and squared, again the temple shox doesn't fit snug.
The "O" has also an additional angle, which doesn't exist with the originals, which are curved throughout.
There's an extra curve at the hinges, where the originals are truly sculpted as one continuous line.
Weird "O" shape...
The hinges aren't flushing into the hammerstems, thicc!
"O" are smallish, doesn't align with the temple shox.
That's all I can find so far, compared to my R1
Here you can see, the typical pointers to a fake R1. The "O" inside is flat instead of following the form. The orbital screws holes doesn't drop down to the "X" nose bridge, it's straight, the screws are, as known, hex screws on the top. The temple shox are protruding at the hinges.
The lower oribtal/"X" nosebridge has philips screws inside, instead of the locking pins. The hammerstem is thicker at the hinges and squared, instead of bevel sanded, probably due to structural reasons, since it's a simple white metal, it probably would bend. And the known nosebombs of the Juliet. Removing it, reveals that there are no hooks for the original bombs.
Here, a much clearer view of the side of the "O".
The end tips at the ears doc are thicker and squared, again the temple shox doesn't fit snug.
The "O" has also an additional angle, which doesn't exist with the originals, which are curved throughout.
There's an extra curve at the hinges, where the originals are truly sculpted as one continuous line.
Weird "O" shape...
The hinges aren't flushing into the hammerstems, thicc!
"O" are smallish, doesn't align with the temple shox.
That's all I can find so far, compared to my R1