this is purely speculation
Isn't this whole thread based on speculation?
This thread is pretty negative, JMO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
this is purely speculation
Not if you ask Jim.this is purely speculation
While the Frogskin helped make the company what it is today, that doesn't mean the style is still needed, or that it shouldn't be discontinued.Does Jim like the Frogskin, not really, or at least that is the impression I got from him. Did it make lots of $$ so the company could pour funds into R & D to make the other cool stuff, yes. Just because he personally didnt like the model does not mean its wasnt a good move for the company overall.
I agree with you 100%.Let's all have a civil discussion, as everyone will definitely have their own opinions abt the topic. =)
Rumor has it that Jim is not a fan of Frogskins, and considers them one of the biggest mistakes the company has made.
From what I've been told he dislikes the fact that the style is a copy of a Ray-Ban Wayfarer.
This may just be a rumor, but I've heard this from a few different sources that have worked for Oakley for many years.