OakleyFreak
I put the G in GMoney
This community is for the community, and while it may seem we are "in charge", we really work for all of you. (don't let it go to your head)
And its a Great Community I must Say
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
This community is for the community, and while it may seem we are "in charge", we really work for all of you. (don't let it go to your head)
I need a bagel with cream cheese sonnie.
Whoa. Into that kind of role playing? Isn't that a totally different forum?What kind of cream cheese would that be M'Lord.
I CONCURThe thing is, the new rules weren't just some spontaneous conjuring by Boss and the mods - they were meant to address long-standing complaints. And not all complaints are made publicly; only the mods know the big picture. Just because you personally don't see a problem doesn't mean there isn't a problem.
And the rules being debated here aren't rules for the entire forum, just the exchange section. This isn't an exchange forum with a discussion section. It's a discussion forum with an exchange section.
In general people resist change. But that doesn't mean a resisted change can't still be an improvement. Sometimes you gotta try something first and see how it works out.
For example, there was the recent change that resulted in more prolific and heavy-handed post deletion moderation. Boss has received feedback now and said it should be backed off. But at least it was tried and he's basing that decision on the results.
So should these. Try them out, observe the results, formulate the go-forward plan based on the results, not everybody's pre-implementation opinion.
Many medical methodologies set back in the '70s (for example) were based on hypothesis, as in "this is a problem so that should be done about it". If that's all there was to it, those methodologies would still be followed today. Instead, enough time has passed that the long-term effectiveness of those methodologies can be evaluated, and a number of them have proven to just be inaccurate, based on the results. So they've been dropped.
Remove the subjectivity and replace it with objectivity.
The thing is, the new rules weren't just some spontaneous conjuring by Boss and the mods - they were meant to address long-standing complaints. And not all complaints are made publicly; only the mods know the big picture.
And the rules being debated here aren't rules for the entire forum, just the exchange section. This isn't an exchange forum with a discussion section. It's a discussion forum with an exchange section.
In general people resist change. But that doesn't mean a resisted change can't still be an improvement. Sometimes you gotta try something first and see how it works out.
For example, there was the recent change that resulted in more prolific and heavy-handed post deletion moderation. Boss has received feedback now and said it should be backed off. But at least it was tried and he's basing that decision on the results.
So should these. Try them out, observe the results, formulate the go-forward plan based on the results, not everybody's pre-implementation opinion.
Many medical methodologies set back in the '70s (for example) were based on hypothesis, as in "this is a problem so that should be done about it". If that's all there was to it, those methodologies would still be followed today. Instead, enough time has passed that the long-term effectiveness of those methodologies can be evaluated, and a number of them have proven to just be inaccurate, based on the results. So they've been dropped.
Remove the subjectivity and replace it with objectivity.
Statement: Flak 2.0 is the best and most versatile non-Elite/XM frame Oakley has ever made. Discuss....Soooo Anyone want talk about Oakleys?!
...Soooo Anyone want talk about Oakleys?!