• Take 30 seconds to register your free account to access deals, post topics, and view exclusive content!

    Register Today

    Join the largest Oakley Forum on the web!
My Oakley PitBoss 1, is real or fake ?
I got it from my old boss, he said he didn't use it anymore, so he gave it to me

Screenshot_20221227-154407~2.png


Screenshot_20221227-154403~2.png


Screenshot_20221227-154359~2.png


Screenshot_20221227-154352~2.png
 
Is it legit? Is it new?
NSJ2 Woodland Camo.

Just got it. Supposedly brand new. Everything about this frame appears correct - weight, camo microfiber bag, lugs, icons... but three things bug me:
1. The print has a seam on the inside top and inside bottom of the orbitals. VERY noticeable. (See first photo)
2. The left lens has polarized etched in it, but not the kings camo etching (otherwise lenses appear brand new)
3. Some marks on the tops of the arms & orbitals almost look like tan scrapes. But it's so hard to tell.

Does anyone else have this frame to compare for me? @Chris169 @zcrxsi @scrodo @Rick58 @Bonz-1 @Jakeracefox


Here's the original listing (seems like a good seller by the way)

99A9C3AC-80D3-471F-8244-607A34200FF3.jpeg
796750B3-3590-4CCF-88DF-BEE11C1E3B6E.jpeg
DB976B3B-4A63-4700-B488-625BD71E6C9A.jpeg
88F92AC8-88B2-4CF4-B3E4-FA395C53A5A8.jpeg
F8CDCF85-4F03-4D54-9C8A-A3212E4C1322.jpeg
 
Is it legit? Is it new?
NSJ2 Woodland Camo.

Just got it. Supposedly brand new. Everything about this frame appears correct - weight, camo microfiber bag, lugs, icons... but three things bug me:
1. The print has a seam on the inside top and inside bottom of the orbitals. VERY noticeable. (See first photo)
2. The left lens has polarized etched in it, but not the kings camo etching (otherwise lenses appear brand new)
3. Some marks on the tops of the arms & orbitals almost look like tan scrapes. But it's so hard to tell.

Does anyone else have this frame to compare for me? @Chris169 @zcrxsi @scrodo @Rick58 @Bonz-1 @Jakeracefox


Here's the original listing (seems like a good seller by the way)

View attachment 1021238View attachment 1021237View attachment 1021239View attachment 1021240View attachment 1021241
Are you sure it’s not the Desert camo? O-Review show two versions of that frame. One with the King’s logo etched and one with just polarized.
 
Thanks @Broccoli I'm not sure, but based on the below stock photos, the NSJ2 frame printing seems more like woodland camo than desert...? Maybe?
Paging @pricedollaz and @XxrumkaxX who I think have the camo frames... please see my above two questions, fellas. Is it legit? Is it new?
77C4CFB4-B169-4B70-9A7C-AE7DEAC613DF.jpeg
4D96C8F8-5831-4491-9409-409C76F83C57.jpeg


In comparison, mine:
D192A0E1-B736-4850-9E12-F2E2586EC7DF.jpeg
BD84C6C6-60E3-4C4C-B9FF-4E5B38E246CF.jpeg
 
Thanks @Broccoli I'm not sure, but based on the below stock photos, the NSJ2 frame printing seems a lot more like woodland camo than desert...?
Paging @pricedollaz and @XxrumkaxX who I think have the camo frames... please see my above two questions, fellas. Is it legit? Is it new?
View attachment 1021262View attachment 1021261
True... they confuse it by using King Camos Woodland name on the newer camo patterns. The first was Kings Desert Camo then they did a better Kings Desert Camo and then a Kings Woodland camo. Most other models that had the Kings camo were Woodland with a few exceptions like the Flak Jackets. The Desert Camo was kinda dropped after the SJ and Flaks but there is a Radar out there sold through Bass pro shops I wish I could find at a reasonable price. I saw it in Memphis and noted it thinking I would be able to get it later and found out the hard way it was limited exclusive. Todays woodland camo Oakleys are a different pattern though it did spring out of Kings they are not Kings Camo...
 
Is it legit? Is it new?
NSJ2 Woodland Camo.

Just got it. Supposedly brand new. Everything about this frame appears correct - weight, camo microfiber bag, lugs, icons... but three things bug me:
1. The print has a seam on the inside top and inside bottom of the orbitals. VERY noticeable. (See first photo)
2. The left lens has polarized etched in it, but not the kings camo etching (otherwise lenses appear brand new)
3. Some marks on the tops of the arms & orbitals almost look like tan scrapes. But it's so hard to tell.

Does anyone else have this frame to compare for me? @Chris169 @zcrxsi @scrodo @Rick58 @Bonz-1 @Jakeracefox


Here's the original listing (seems like a good seller by the way)

View attachment 1021238View attachment 1021237View attachment 1021239View attachment 1021240View attachment 1021241
OK thanks @XxrumkaxX Might be easier if we talk off-line and I text you a video of the frame. But if you scroll up you can see my original photos. Are you able to help me id which one I have? Also, why does the screen print have such a noticeable seam? Is it legit? Or did Oakley get sloppy with their seams?
 
Is it legit? Is it new?
NSJ2 Woodland Camo.

Just got it. Supposedly brand new. Everything about this frame appears correct - weight, camo microfiber bag, lugs, icons... but three things bug me:
1. The print has a seam on the inside top and inside bottom of the orbitals. VERY noticeable. (See first photo)
2. The left lens has polarized etched in it, but not the kings camo etching (otherwise lenses appear brand new)
3. Some marks on the tops of the arms & orbitals almost look like tan scrapes. But it's so hard to tell.

Does anyone else have this frame to compare for me? @Chris169 @zcrxsi @scrodo @Rick58 @Bonz-1 @Jakeracefox


Here's the original listing (seems like a good seller by the way)

View attachment 1021238View attachment 1021237View attachment 1021239View attachment 1021240View attachment 1021241
I totally did not scroll up and see these.... that is a Kings camo desert camo and as long as the frame matches the 24-156 sku then it is legit... someone just replaced the lenses is all... Each frame was supposed to be unique and one of a kind so they all have different patterns. The earlier ones made were shinier and the later ones more matte. Here are my 5 deserts all different in pattern. The line or crease is because these were wrapped … mine have it to. More obvious in earlier ones…
46E8C643-1C43-4EBF-8879-D364D2D2FF6E.jpeg
BFBD7E10-D890-415E-B94F-95857E730C37.jpeg
 
Back
Top