Sphaera

[docrusty]

 

[MicahS]

They must have some faith in this design since they already have plans for like 15 colorways based on the first post. I'll definitely be skipping them, along with the other one.

 

[joshbrinzo]

These are hilariously terrible. Another step backwards.

 

[pjd1234]

 

[sundevil516]

The "bit on the inside of the arm" I believe is LFG...I think we all know what that means. When we got the first views of these in training as the new spring/summer release, that's what they were called. I guess they changed their minds and went with Sphera.

 

[GregW]

Fugly and Foakley looking. #NOTMYOAKLEY!

 

[Inkkoonce]

View attachment 1114281

You won’t ever see me in these! I can guarantee you that brother!

 

[Tomcat14]

You won’t ever see me in these! I can guarantee you that brother!

I know you want a pair

 

[Ventruck]

There's just a big "why?" to it.

If it's one of those function-over-form things that just happened to have a weird result....well ok. But they should explain it. As it is, I'm not a fan of the lens swap system, unless they refined it with the nose piece not being loose/separate. This looks like it may function fine as a whole, but doesn't really come with any reason to exist. I mean we could've just gotten a "facelifted" Radar EV that is backwards compatible and that would've been a smarter idea.

This might be an attempt to replace the Radar, but I'll take notice they weren't willing to actually take on the Radar name altogether.

 

[JK_Cycling]

Yeah fully agree, if they did a „facelifted“ / updated Radar EV, it could be a huge success.

They will try to push the Spheara apparently, but it will fail. As you say there’s no real reason for it to exist. It doesn’t even have a real design IMO.