WildWires
I should Work at Oakley
- 1,432
- 1,723
Hi everybody- I picked up a pair of these Wiretap 2.0 glasses a couple days ago.
These were on my list to pick up because about 10 years ago I got a pair of half wire 2.0 and I loved them, they were actually the first pair that I really liked. I like the half rim design in a wire frame- and I actually got 2 different color ways, prizm daily polarized in a pewter frame, as well as prizm deep water polarized in a matte lead frame. Between the two of them I personally prefer the daily/pewter. One thing I think we all know is Oakley/Luxxotica’s quality control is subpar which is actually why I am not keeping the deep water/lead pair, the hinges don’t feel right (I had this same problem with a pair of whiskers too). It is still a sweet color for people who like that, just not for me. Anyhow, a few key comments with pictures below:
Fit:
I consider myself to have a large/extra large head (hat size 7 5/8 - 7 3/4). These fit me well. The fit on these is extremely similar to the square wire 2014, but with spring hinges. The lens is taller versus the Whisker 2020, which I do like. The spring hinges make these really comfortable, and I personally think these fit very similar to a Flak 2.0, original Flak Jacket, maybe even half jacket 1.0?
Style:
I think to me these remind me of a cross between the half wire 2.0, and the original wire taps. They have that subtle ‘Oakley’ wire look. The temples have some unique styling (it is all metal by the way, not unobtanium style detail). There ARE unobtanium socks in the back of the wire frame similar to all other wire pairs, which makes them comfortable. I think the pewter/prizm daily polarized is a nod back to the original wiretaps’ cement/OO BIP colorway.
Lens:
Not really much to say here. They are prizm daily polarized. If you aren’t familiar with that lens, it is a contrast polarized lens that has a rose/purple look when looking through it, with a grey-ish look when looking at them. There isn’t any iridium coating (that I know of). I do like the lens, but that is my own personal opinion. They have some unique color ways available, just make sure you have a chance to try on your individual pair due to Lux’s QC.
Overall Thoughts:
I like this pair- it is a nod back to when Oakley was ‘Oakley’ but still has some of the newer technology like Prizm lens. The Wiretap 2.0 is a bit heavier versus the Square Wire 2014 or Whisker 2020, but it does balance well enough on the face. They do make this pair in a titanium version for Rx too so that might be a solution for some people. I like this pair for nostalgic reasons. Other than that I think it is a nice add to the wire line-up along with square wire 2014, whisker 2020, ejector, and the new savitar. Just my initial thoughts.
These were on my list to pick up because about 10 years ago I got a pair of half wire 2.0 and I loved them, they were actually the first pair that I really liked. I like the half rim design in a wire frame- and I actually got 2 different color ways, prizm daily polarized in a pewter frame, as well as prizm deep water polarized in a matte lead frame. Between the two of them I personally prefer the daily/pewter. One thing I think we all know is Oakley/Luxxotica’s quality control is subpar which is actually why I am not keeping the deep water/lead pair, the hinges don’t feel right (I had this same problem with a pair of whiskers too). It is still a sweet color for people who like that, just not for me. Anyhow, a few key comments with pictures below:
Fit:
I consider myself to have a large/extra large head (hat size 7 5/8 - 7 3/4). These fit me well. The fit on these is extremely similar to the square wire 2014, but with spring hinges. The lens is taller versus the Whisker 2020, which I do like. The spring hinges make these really comfortable, and I personally think these fit very similar to a Flak 2.0, original Flak Jacket, maybe even half jacket 1.0?
Style:
I think to me these remind me of a cross between the half wire 2.0, and the original wire taps. They have that subtle ‘Oakley’ wire look. The temples have some unique styling (it is all metal by the way, not unobtanium style detail). There ARE unobtanium socks in the back of the wire frame similar to all other wire pairs, which makes them comfortable. I think the pewter/prizm daily polarized is a nod back to the original wiretaps’ cement/OO BIP colorway.
Lens:
Not really much to say here. They are prizm daily polarized. If you aren’t familiar with that lens, it is a contrast polarized lens that has a rose/purple look when looking through it, with a grey-ish look when looking at them. There isn’t any iridium coating (that I know of). I do like the lens, but that is my own personal opinion. They have some unique color ways available, just make sure you have a chance to try on your individual pair due to Lux’s QC.
Overall Thoughts:
I like this pair- it is a nod back to when Oakley was ‘Oakley’ but still has some of the newer technology like Prizm lens. The Wiretap 2.0 is a bit heavier versus the Square Wire 2014 or Whisker 2020, but it does balance well enough on the face. They do make this pair in a titanium version for Rx too so that might be a solution for some people. I like this pair for nostalgic reasons. Other than that I think it is a nice add to the wire line-up along with square wire 2014, whisker 2020, ejector, and the new savitar. Just my initial thoughts.