New Sub Zero?

[Tomcat14]

Mine came in today, Boxed, label was ripped off for some reason, no padding on the inside of the box. Glasses and box are in good order, no scratches but they defiantly need to work on the boxing especially for the price paid. No reason to not add a little padding to the box to keep it from sliding around.

View attachment 1144007

View attachment 1144008

View attachment 1144009

View attachment 1144010

They thought the paper was enough to keep the box from sliding around

 

[The Saint]

Mine showed up perfect.

 

[Dullisc]

They thought the paper was enough to keep the box from sliding around

They were wrong. I heard it.

 

[reggavegga]

Got mine from Oakley.com used 30 off code … no problems with shipping. Too narrow for my chubby face ..

 

[Shady Day]

First of all I am a huge fan of the 2022 release. I have found very few pairs of Oakley that I don’t like the look of on me (thus why I own so many pairs). However something about these feel like they are too wide, @reggavegga says above too narrow for “chubby face”. I believe it is actually the wide, fat lenses that are not flattering on the 2024 release. They look bloated to me especially with oval heads like we have.

The 2022 release I find more flattering and they feel more tall and less wide. I also prefer the lines on the 2022 release. And the red lenses on the 2022 release are darker and more mirrored. The 2024 can see my eyes very clearly through them.

All in all for sure for the money these don’t feel at all worth it. I prefer the look of the 2022 release and both of these pairs are going back to Oakley. Would I have kept at 50% off? That would be a harder decision but not sure they are even worth that to me.

 

[Patient_Cero]

 

[Chattabox23]

If anyone is dissatisfied with their zeros and wanna work something out, I’m all ears lol

 

[Kingme]

 

[Shady Day]

View attachment 1144431

A little more mirror on the lenses and I am all over these Haha.

 

[XxRuMKaxX]

First of all I am a huge fan of the 2022 release. I have found very few pairs of Oakley that I don’t like the look of on me (thus why I own so many pairs). However something about these feel like they are too wide, @reggavegga says above too narrow for “chubby face”. I believe it is actually the wide, fat lenses that are not flattering on the 2024 release. They look bloated to me especially with oval heads like we have.

The 2022 release I find more flattering and they feel more tall and less wide. I also prefer the lines on the 2022 release. And the red lenses on the 2022 release are darker and more mirrored. The 2024 can see my eyes very clearly through them.

All in all for sure for the money these don’t feel at all worth it. I prefer the look of the 2022 release and both of these pairs are going back to Oakley. Would I have kept at 50% off? That would be a harder decision but not sure they are even worth that to me.

View attachment 1144388

View attachment 1144389

View attachment 1144390

View attachment 1144391

Torch has always been a low light lens so seeing through them is common... If you live in a snowy environment they are super useful in the snow prizm and in the regular prizm make a great partly cloudy to cloudy day lens