U
Username Hidden
Guest
Username Hidden said:
Not so. This is a matching serial, and the mod has edited my post. Some actually think I tried to deceive, which is NOT true. I would never do that.
- Take 30 seconds to register your free account to access deals, post topics, and view exclusive content! Register TodayJoin the largest Oakley Forum on the web!
- Status
Not so. This is a matching serial, and the mod has edited my post. Some actually think I tried to deceive, which is NOT true. I would never do that.UUsername Hidden
Guest
I have seen prefix numbers and letters but never a number different in between. That is what I'm trying to point out.
And I didn't edit your post, it was just pointed out to me.UUsername Hidden
Guest
Username Hidden said:
Still, it was unfair of you to say I was not truthful in my post. Now you've seen a new variant of serial, but it doesn't mean because you never saw it before that I'm trying to deceive anyone.UUsername Hidden
Guest
Username Hidden said:
Really?!?! The numbers didn't match in the middle of the sequence, it's clear to anyone that looks at it.
It was pointed out by other members. What? Oakley decides to just leave out a number in sequential order? They forgot to type it? It was printed on a Friday? They swapped the 1 and 2 around at the last minute? Technically 21916 and 12916 are different numbers even if we drop the first 1 off the serial.
Why are we discussing this further?UUsername Hidden
Guest
Username Hidden said:
You think it's more likely I just happened on this R1 box with only 5 printed digits, matching the very digits of my R1 frame?
Nevermind then.
BTW, if my intention was to deceive, I wouldn't have posted super clear photos of box and serial.UUsername Hidden
Guest
UUsername Hidden
Guest
Closing this thread until the serial mystery is solved.- Status
Similar threads
