lloydrose
I should Work at Oakley
Ouch. So were there issues with the glasses? Or just the box?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It's unfortunate how they do that "frosting" now. It appears instead of frosting they just run an tool over the lens to create the effect. The last release has the same thing.Everything is super...
super bended
super scratched
...but not super quality
View attachment 1143552View attachment 1143553View attachment 1143554
Thank you Luxottica.
That will be returned.
In case of question; the box was ripped when I got it from the UPS guy.
Just look at the nosebridge section of the SubZero. Do you see the tool marks? I have a 1994 pair which still looks better than this "new" one.Ouch. So were there issues with the glasses? Or just the box?
How do you know?Inflation. As far as flimsy, did you ever have any of the 90's originals? The first release of Sub Zero #1's for example were very stiff and prone to cracking at the nose bridge...ask me how I know. At least back then they had a true warranty program and would exchange glasses in most cases.
@MicahS posted a pic in his collection thread.Anyone get the carbon fiber yet?
Everything is super...
super bended
super scratched
...but not super quality
View attachment 1143552View attachment 1143553View attachment 1143554
Thank you Luxottica.
That will be returned.
In case of question; the box was ripped when I got it from the UPS guy.
Sent you a message.I ended up with two Burnt Brush... If someone wants to save on state tax that lives in a high tax state I can sell it for retail plus about $6 to ship it ground... if no one wants it I will keep em and maybe use one in the wild....