2020 US Presidential Election Thread

[Zax]

It's funny to see you quoting blank space since I've blocked the person that I know you are responding to.

Probably for the best hah

 

[Atticus]

He's moving over there to help, not vote. You made the assumption he is moving there to vote. You are spreading false information sir.

I've read similar articles with some Californians...doesn't support that they will actually vote, but definitely sticking their nose in, IMO. I honestly think they need to be careful. A lot of the country has very negative views on California and NYC....may backfire in the long run.

California residents flock to Georgia to help Democrats in Senate run-offs

If the Democrats capture both seats, the Senate would have 50 Democrats and 50 Republicans with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris casting votes to break ties.

nypost.com

 

[Lexkempo]

You're canadian so keep your opinions on your side of the border. Plus you canadians have your own problems to worry about
View attachment 814901

Keep it in your pants Flyboy.

Don’t lash out on me because you lost your election and your BFF in the same month.

 

[qtrain23]

Here's what his Tweet said: "
Great news #yanggang - Evelyn and I are moving to Georgia to help
@ossoff
and
@ReverendWarnock
win! This is our only chance to clear Mitch out of the way and help Joe and Kamala get things done in the next 4 years. More details to come but let’s go!!!"
The fact that he said they "are moving to Georgia to help" in the runoff suggests otherwise. You wouldn't "move" to help in an election. He never said he is not going to vote in the election after "mov[ing]" to Georgia.
Here's a link to his Tweet:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1325248601568796673

Nowhere in his tweet or that article does it say anything about them voting in that election

 

[qtrain23]

There's a lot of proof of voter fraud. In NV there was someone who has been dead for over half a century that voted, so clearly saying there is no voter fraud is a lie that the Party of Racism and Socialism keeps repeating. If your side would agree to a Federal Voter ID Law then these claims could be easily disproven, but they won't for some reason or another because almost every instance of voter fraud are ballots cast for them.

There really isn’t. 150M+ people voted. You’re talking an extremely small, insignificant amount of fraud.

Trumps own task force found this out when they checked into it in 2016.

 

[qtrain23]

Huh look at that. No fraud. Who knew

Barr: No evidence of fraud that'd change election outcome

Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election...

kstp.com

 

[Zax]

Huh look at that. No fraud. Who knew

Barr: No evidence of fraud that'd change election outcome

Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election...

kstp.com

Fake news...obviously

 

[ZCForge]

Huh look at that. No fraud. Who knew

Barr: No evidence of fraud that'd change election outcome

Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election...

kstp.com

There was tons of fraud just not the type of fraud you’re expecting. When state supreme courts change election law as they did in at least two states to:
-allow mail in ballots to be counted after Election Day
-allow mail in ballots to be counted that had mismatched or no signature at all
-allow mail in ballots to be counted that had no postmark

that’s judicial fraud.

Specifically, in PA, the state legislature and ONLY the state legislature were enumerated with the power to make/change/amend election laws. Pennsylvania’s constitution is very clear about that.

 

[Zax]

There was tons of fraud just not the type of fraud you’re expecting. When state supreme courts change election law as they did in at least two states to:
-allow mail in ballots to be counted after Election Day
-allow mail in ballots to be counted that had mismatched or no signature at all
-allow mail in ballots to be counted that had no postmark

that’s judicial fraud.

Specifically, in PA, the state legislature and ONLY the state legislature were enumerated with the power to make/change/amend election laws. Pennsylvania’s constitution is very clear about that.

Let’s just toss all of the votes from PA

 

[ZCForge]

Let’s just toss all of the votes from PA

That’s not what I’m saying. The law states any ballots received after 830pm on Election Day are to be discarded. The state Supreme Court changed that to 6pm on Friday (3 days after the election) which they do not have the constitutional authority to do.

The judicial branch cannot change law as they did. Reason? Because those courts are not represented by the people. Instead of being elected, they are appointed.

That is why the legislator and only the legislature has the power to create/change/amend laws. There is a reason why separation of powers exists between the three branches of government.