Hi all, could really use some help. Prizm Field is driving me crazy. I understand there was originally an Outfield and an Infield, and now there’s just Field. Some have said that Field is the same as the previous Outfield, but 2 separate Oakley reps have now told me Outfield, Infield, and Field are 3 distinctly different lenses. Does anyone have old Outfield and current Field that they could post a comparison picture of (or, if you disagree with the reps, could you explain why you know new Field = old Outfield)? Mostly looking for a view of the outside finish, since that’s what appears to be most differentiating.
The photo is of all the orders I’ve received (all this month) trying to get to the bottom of this: the 3 w/cartons are from online retailers, the loose set is direct from Oakley (after I got tired of the guesswork, I went straight to the source, but I’m still as confused as ever). The top set is clearly Infield (barcode and box both say so, and it’s definitely higher VLT and grayer base color).
My confusion is with the 3 others. All 3 have a sort of rose base tint (all very similar to look through). The middle carton and loose set seem identical, but the ones in the bottom carton are clearly different.
Here’s info on: [how they were sold/listed online]; [what the packaging says]; [what the barcode says]
Middle Carton: Outfield; Field; Outfield
Bottom Carton: Field; Field; Field (and “PrizmOutfi” on a second seller-generated barcode)
Loose: Field/[no carton]/BB Otfl
It’s sort of like the middle 2 are closer to Ruby Iridium and the bottom is closer to Fire Iridium. My hypothesis is the middle 2 are current Field and the bottom is the old Outfield. This is what I’m looking to confirm.
For what it’s worth, Oakley says the loose set are the bona fide, current Field, even though they’re barcoded as Outfield. I’m inclined to believe them, despite the fact that they created this mess in the first place. I know I should just pick the ones I like and not care so much, but it’s really stuck in my craw; after all, they decided to consolidate the Field product line, so I guess I’m just looking for confirmation on which ones of these are the “latest and greatest.” Thanks!
The photo is of all the orders I’ve received (all this month) trying to get to the bottom of this: the 3 w/cartons are from online retailers, the loose set is direct from Oakley (after I got tired of the guesswork, I went straight to the source, but I’m still as confused as ever). The top set is clearly Infield (barcode and box both say so, and it’s definitely higher VLT and grayer base color).
My confusion is with the 3 others. All 3 have a sort of rose base tint (all very similar to look through). The middle carton and loose set seem identical, but the ones in the bottom carton are clearly different.
Here’s info on: [how they were sold/listed online]; [what the packaging says]; [what the barcode says]
Middle Carton: Outfield; Field; Outfield
Bottom Carton: Field; Field; Field (and “PrizmOutfi” on a second seller-generated barcode)
Loose: Field/[no carton]/BB Otfl
It’s sort of like the middle 2 are closer to Ruby Iridium and the bottom is closer to Fire Iridium. My hypothesis is the middle 2 are current Field and the bottom is the old Outfield. This is what I’m looking to confirm.
For what it’s worth, Oakley says the loose set are the bona fide, current Field, even though they’re barcoded as Outfield. I’m inclined to believe them, despite the fact that they created this mess in the first place. I know I should just pick the ones I like and not care so much, but it’s really stuck in my craw; after all, they decided to consolidate the Field product line, so I guess I’m just looking for confirmation on which ones of these are the “latest and greatest.” Thanks!
