You have it in hand?This is so funny because I know for a fact that the first example is sunken, it was never even a question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You have it in hand?This is so funny because I know for a fact that the first example is sunken, it was never even a question.
Whose expert opinion do I take because there have been members on here who said the logo was sunken as well. And one member who stated the serial numbers looked “laser etched” so…., even when going against the group isn’t comfortable.
I could go on about group psychology:
“there is a significant group mentality and psychology involved with people accepting or even seeking out counterfeits. It goes beyond just saving money and taps into deeper psychological drivers, including a desire for social status and a phenomenon known as the "counterfeit self."
You seem very aggressive and even uncomfortable with the idea that counterfeits exist even with serial numbers. You also went right in to mark you social standing here with an aggressive nature so forgive me if I don’t think you’re exactly impartial.
I never said I wanted to know if any of these glasses were authentic, I wanted to know if Oakley ever released X-Metal, Romeo 1’s with a sunken “X” logo on the bridge. Does anyone actually read the original question or go straight to meme’s.View attachment 1284850
I mean if you want to know if the glasses are authentic?? Get a pic of the whole glasses and not just some serial.
Did Oakley ever release any Romeo 1’s that didn’t not have a raised “X” insignia and came with clearly sunken “X”’s?
It’s more that you completely lost it when any information or opinion was offered in contradiction to your own, of which you gave no explanation to. Then you went on a rampage fighting with people who know infinitely more than you. After which you took what you needed and offered nothing at all to the community here, so thanks for the exploit.I never said I wanted to know if any of these glasses were authentic, I wanted to know if Oakley ever released X-Metal, Romeo 1’s with a sunken “X” logo on the bridge. Does anyone actually read the original question or go straight to meme’s.
I now see that adding the pictures (which I did for context) was a big mistake and only caused confusion, even though I’ve explained my exact question a few times now. I will admit I could have handled this thread in a much cleaner way. Possibly just the question alone would have sufficed and been a less debatable way to handle getting the information I needed. I’m new to this forum and never spend anytime in any online forums because they become places of negativity over information most of the time. At least that’s been my experience with what limited experience I have. I now feel like I’m defending myself more than receiving any kind of actual information on my question. I did at least get a couple responses that I will assume means that Oakley did not release sunken logos on the Romeo 1’s.
Thanks again to anyone who answered my question.
Why can’t I ask a simple question that shouldn’t be that difficult to answer without getting questioned about my motives. It was a very simple question that I thought could be answered by people who know about what Oakley had and had not released. Why do I have to answer why this is important to me, it’s a simple question and I thought this would be the proper forum to ask it.Why is this so important my son???
If they are legit then obviously the answer is YES!!!!!!!!!!!!! Geeez!View attachment 1284866
I never once anyone to debate the pictures and weather the logos were raised or sunken and I admitted to making a mistake even posting any pic because that did cause a debate I was not interested in. I already know for fact that one of those are of a sunken logo, there was no debate to be had. That’s why I was attempting to point this out when people were arguing the raised/sunkenIt’s more that you completely lost it when any information or opinion was offered in contradiction to your own, of which you gave no explanation to. Then you went on a rampage fighting with people who know infinitely more than you. After which you took what you needed and offered nothing at all to the community here, so thanks for the exploit.
Good day, sir.