SharkSugender
I should Work at Oakley
- 3,622
- 1,823
I like your profile pic brotherdid you get the new blinders for pennys? I heard the new batch are pretty good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I like your profile pic brotherdid you get the new blinders for pennys? I heard the new batch are pretty good.
I looked for mars mj pjotos on google and his photo was the first thing i sawDang. I really thought you were the person in your profile pic. A true legend in his own rite. He had close association with Oakley for about a decade and had the unique opportunity to try some releases as well as unreleased O frames.
Any particular reason you went with that pic? Close association, relations?
I don't know if these are the latest release from bong torresdid you get the new blinders for pennys? I heard the new batch are pretty good.
That bear lives in an abusive homeIf the x man says no side blinders than I won’t do side blinders. ... but maybe I’ll order some just to have some. my plan was to add some metal spikes on the sides of the side blinders to make the juliets look extra tough.
View attachment 854969
Those look hot. Have they ever messed up the frames like scuffs or scratches? Are they stiff or a bit flexible?
Bong Torres?These are a hard plastic or resin, hence stiff, but neither has messed up the OEM finish of the frames; no scratches or scuffs. Both came from the same source in the Phillipines. 2 members here sell them (or they used to), and both buy them from the guy who makes them, and it's much cheaper to buy from them because of shipping costs
Yep! He's the only one selling those in the PhilippinesBong Torres?
Looks like every other side blinder. Non of these blinders are branded if that's what you're askingWhat kind of blinders(?) are these?View attachment 990149
They don’t like like blinders at all. There doesn’t appear to be anything on the sides.What kind of blinders(?) are these?View attachment 990149