• Take 30 seconds to register your free account to access deals, post topics, and view exclusive content!

    Register Today

    Join the largest Oakley Forum on the web!

Official Fakes/Possible Fakes Inquiry Thread (ARE THESE FAKE? POST FAKES HERE)

I'd say a YES, with the nose bridge Icon Text being perfect. Everything checks out.

Frame: Jet Black w/Black
Lens: Persimmon
Family: Sport
Price: $130
SKU: 03-182
Date: January 1998-1999

Or

Frame: Jet Black w/Black
Lens: VR28
Family: Sport
Price: $130
SKU: 03-174
Date: January 1998-1999
Thank you, they really seems legit but I'm so affraid of being scammed lol taht's why I ask again. No SKU in the branchs like a regular one, just this little thing is the left branch slightly twisted but it s due to the material which is not rigid I think it's ok. The rubber seems legit too.

300€ I made a deal
 
My first pair and wanted to know if these are legit please (Oakley Flak 2.0)? Some points i noticed:

1. The quality of rubber seems unfinished as attached. With rubbery parts coming out.
2. Serial number side instead of the O there is a □. Is that normal as i have not seen on any other pair.
3. The Prizm mark on lens has a typo and a P at the end. That does not look normal at all.

WhatsApp Image 2025-09-04 at 9.17.55 PM (1).jpeg


WhatsApp Image 2025-09-04 at 9.17.55 PM.jpeg


WhatsApp Image 2025-09-04 at 9.17.56 PM (1).jpeg


WhatsApp Image 2025-09-04 at 9.17.56 PM.jpeg


WhatsApp Image 2025-09-04 at 9.22.00 PM.jpeg


WhatsApp Image 2025-09-04 at 9.24.30 PM.jpeg
 
From far, it doesnt seem strang,e but ur closer looks seems very suspicious, the oakley mark on the nose bridge seems "pixelised", the PRIZM font on the Z is sus as **** ? The rubbers seems low quality, even the plastic white part seems to have some strange texture
 
From far, it doesnt seem strang,e but ur closer looks seems very suspicious, the oakley mark on the nose bridge seems "pixelised", the PRIZM font on the Z is sus as **** ? The rubbers seems low quality, even the plastic white part seems to have some strange texture

And you would not believe but these are ordered directly from oakley.com... I have written them an email, hoping for a good response
 
My first pair and wanted to know if these are legit please (Oakley Flak 2.0)? Some points i noticed:

1. The quality of rubber seems unfinished as attached. With rubbery parts coming out.
2. Serial number side instead of the O there is a □. Is that normal as i have not seen on any other pair.
3. The Prizm mark on lens has a typo and a P at the end. That does not look normal at all.

View attachment 1281977

View attachment 1281978

View attachment 1281979

View attachment 1281980

View attachment 1281981

View attachment 1281982
Please take a pic of the sku number from the left ear stem. The P is for polarized, which I thought they stopped doing.
 
Back
Top