Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Thank you, they really seems legit but I'm so affraid of being scammed lol taht's why I ask again. No SKU in the branchs like a regular one, just this little thing is the left branch slightly twisted but it s due to the material which is not rigid I think it's ok. The rubber seems legit too.
From far, it doesnt seem strang,e but ur closer looks seems very suspicious, the oakley mark on the nose bridge seems "pixelised", the PRIZM font on the Z is sus as **** ? The rubbers seems low quality, even the plastic white part seems to have some strange texture
You know what, I would believe it. Considering their QC has gone down the sh1tter over these recent years, yes I would.And you would not believe but these are ordered directly from oakley.com... I have written them an email, hoping for a good response
Please take a pic of the sku number from the left ear stem. The P is for polarized, which I thought they stopped doing.My first pair and wanted to know if these are legit please (Oakley Flak 2.0)? Some points i noticed:
1. The quality of rubber seems unfinished as attached. With rubbery parts coming out.
2. Serial number side instead of the O there is a □. Is that normal as i have not seen on any other pair.
3. The Prizm mark on lens has a typo and a P at the end. That does not look normal at all.
View attachment 1281977
View attachment 1281978
View attachment 1281979
View attachment 1281980
View attachment 1281981
View attachment 1281982
That's all the numbers there are on the glassesPlease take a pic of the sku number from the left ear stem. The P is for polarized, which I thought they stopped doing.