• Take 30 seconds to register your free account to access deals, post topics, and view exclusive content!

    Register Today

    Join the largest Oakley Forum on the web!
There is apparently a carabiner on the case that came with a SI pair, can’t recall which, but it doesn’t have the tag.

Edit: found two, the SI M Frame 3.0 Array

View attachment 998157

and the SI Shocktube

View attachment 998158

currently come with one.

I see, thanks for your reply!

So the tag is definetly a sign that it is a fake... it also looks really odd.

Anyway now I know what to look out for in the future. Thanks!
 
Hi everyone, I am about to pull the trigger for my first pair of eye jacket gen 2. Can anyone help me identify if this silver pair is legit?

Additionally, if I send them to optical shop to insert a prescription lens, what are the chances that this frame will break? Thank you in advance for your help!

8005AAC1-FCB3-454B-A951-3115657B9C7C.jpeg


058E589B-F69E-4731-9799-2E9F73C58A31.jpeg


1B640E1F-4562-48C2-AEC5-EA319E18AA1E.jpeg


264B045F-4BEC-4E82-9A3A-9C3B4B80C632.jpeg


8C7AD2A1-03AF-4271-978B-37D7D9BE01CD.jpeg
 
Hi everyone, I am about to pull the trigger for my first pair of eye jacket gen 2. Can anyone help me identify if this silver pair is legit?

Additionally, if I send them to optical shop to insert a prescription lens, what are the chances that this frame will break? Thank you in advance for your help!

View attachment 998468

View attachment 998469

View attachment 998470

View attachment 998471

View attachment 998472
To answer your other question.
It would not be the best choice to have Rx lenses cut for.
 
What makes you think it could be a fake?
The SKU number, mostly. Looks like it's 009343-02 instead of OO9343-02. I had read that it should be OO and not 00.

But, I'm unlearned in these arts.

edited: sorry I see I included the same photo twice instead of the SKU photo. Apparently I'm a novice in basic forum posting as well as Joakley identification.
 
Back
Top