• Take 30 seconds to register your free account to access deals, post topics, and view exclusive content!

    Register Today

    Join the largest Oakley Forum on the web!

Official Fakes/Possible Fakes Inquiry Thread (ARE THESE FAKE? POST FAKES HERE)

Yeh, but last I checked Amazon has a stringent requirement before a vendor can sell clothing accessories via their portal. Some legit business must have somehow acquired fake stock without knowing. Warden wires... geez
 
I found these on EBay today...I was hoping to get some expert opinions on this pair of Badmans:
New Oakley Badman Sapphire Polarized Sunglasses OO6020 04 Authentic | eBay

BTW...this is my first post. I appreciate all the info that you guys provide here.

Welcome to the family :)

It's hard to tell without closeup pics but one thing for sure I noted different to mine is the left arm and nose piece. Theirs has printed "60 o 21" printed on the arm whereas mine is on the nose bridge. This is very strange unless Oakley decided to change things around between the batches.
 
I found these on EBay today...I was hoping to get some expert opinions on this pair of Badmans:
New Oakley Badman Sapphire Polarized Sunglasses OO6020 04 Authentic | eBay

BTW...this is my first post. I appreciate all the info that you guys provide here.


compare to others and you will see the fine detail on these are VERY hard to replicate. they look legit o to menumbers match and here is a refund guarantee, so, but my guess is he bought them new and wore them a few and then decided to sell em, that's why he says MINT condition.


this model on Ebay has on the left arm as well so its must be legit, I also think the lighting is throwing off the look as well.

Oakley Badman Plasma Sapphire Iridium Polarized Brand New | eBay
 
Last edited:
I don't know, I don't own a Badman, but I don't understand how a couple of months after release there are Badmans/Madmans without the tube case that they all come with by default?

I also think that the text looks a bit odd. Perhaps it's just the picture but to me it doesn't look straight. I also agree with @jdd32. The pictures on sunglasshut.com have it on the nose bridge as well. So, while I'm no expert, for me there are a couple of things that don't stack up.
 
I don't know, I don't own a Badman, but I don't understand how a couple of months after release there are Badmans/Madmans without the tube case that they all come with by default?

I also think that the text looks a bit odd. Perhaps it's just the picture but to me it doesn't look straight. I also agree with @jdd32. The pictures on sunglasshut.com have it on the nose bridge as well. So, while I'm no expert, for me there are a couple of things that don't stack up.
Welcome to the family :)

It's hard to tell without closeup pics but one thing for sure I noted different to mine is the left arm and nose piece. Theirs has printed "60 o 21" printed on the arm whereas mine is on the nose bridge. This is very strange unless Oakley decided to change things around between the batches.

I don't have my badman here but those number are also in the stem and not in the nose bridge. The only pair I saw with nose bridge is on the picture under this thread
Badman and Madman | Oakley Forum which are sales samples.
 

Latest Posts

Back
Top